chrisp
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
- Messages
- 1,931
- Reaction score
- 5,265
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Melbourne Victoria
- Members Ride
- VF2 MY16 SS Redline Sportwagon
I'll I'm going to add is that in a criminal court, the onus is on the prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that something either wasn't done or done correctly. If the prosecutions case relied only only one expert witness then it was always a very poor case. It's also very poor if the expert didn't have comprehensive notes on his findings so another expert could take over the case. Seems that the case was rather weak as is demonstrated by the government dropping the case.
It would actually have been better if this had actually made it to court in a reasonable time frame, then he way well have been found not guilty and had his name cleared and potentially seek costs instead of what he faces now.
You need to remember that he was certified and still is certified by the department that was intending to prosecute him. A bit strange to prosecute someone and yet let them continue to perform shoddy work as they alleged in their prosecution.
That reminds me of the quote that says ‘the wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine’.
There seems to be some contention as to who originally said that quote as it seems to be an amalgamation of a couple of older quotes (‘wheels of justice’, and the ‘mills of god’), but seems to date back 100s (or even 1000s) of years. But it seems just as appropriate today.
One thing that does ring true is that we don’t want to get caught up in those ‘wheels of justice’ as very few come out unscathed (guilty or not).
Last edited: