Well, typical that some one has doubts (note, that doesn't mean a denier, it means I have issues I haven't been convinced of yet) gets a gobful from someone who is convinced.
I said I didn't think Australia was the best place to assess climate change. That was purely because we are already a nation of extreme weather patterns. Are we REALLY the best place to determine rising temperatures, compared to countries which don't experience extremes as the norm? At no time did I say it wasn't getting warmer, I said the climate is undergoing change. Is that too hard to understand? Clearly, it was.
Oceans rising? Bullshit. If the oceans are rising and inundating low lying island groups, why aren't our tides showing the same increases? Why aren't our low lying coastal suburbs also threatened with inundation? It's the same ocean, after all, or does it only rise where it can suit the argument? That one argument is the most specious used by climate change exponents. The leaders of various Pacific nations used that excuse to persuade us to gift them half a billion dollars to fight climate change. If they're going under, how will they use the money - by building bloody big walls around their islands to keep the water out?
Yes, our climate is changing, but the paranoia that has gripped so many, to the point that we now have a climate emergency, is the area of greatest difference between people like yourself and those like me who accept change is occurring, but not at the speed claimed.
